DrCarney.com Blog

Health - Food - Science - Community
5 minutes reading time (1015 words)

Cancer Simplified

Kendall-Lane-with-credit-800

Guest Blogger Contribution.

Sometimes In life, the most epiphany level revelations are simply a matter of connecting the dots of knowledge you already have.

This blog is to share the education learned from our experience with Callie's Cancer. As with most subjects, after connecting the dots of complexities, the essence of the subject becomes vividly clear and simple. These past 20 months has been amazingly educational; connecting many dots between digestive anatomy, food chain and the relationship between food, inflammation and cancer. As the connections between them becomes clear, a flood of answers is revealed, and misconceptions cleared.

Highlights of what we have learned:
* Cats (and likely all carnivores) are not immune to inflammations from eating meat.
* Cats (and likely all carnivores) are not immune to cholesterol and cardiovascular issues.
* Feeding a cat vegan is not the same as feeding a horse meat.
* At the beginning of this effort, I believed that herbivores and carnivores were polar opposites. This education, however, reveals that it is not polar at all. It is a serial, linear life-line that begins with plants and ends with carnivores.
* Meat, dairy or any derivative of any animal is not a nutrition source. It is a way-station. I previously believed that animals created nutrients (such as protein) that are not available from plants, but now I realize that is a misconception. The reality is that herbivores have the anatomy to extract all nutrients from plants (including protein) while carnivores are missing much of that anatomy. Instead, carnivores get their nutrients from eating the herbivore, that ate and extracted the nutrients from the plants. The herbivore (prey animal) is a nutrient way-station for the carnivore and all nutrients (including protein) that originated in plants.

What is cancer?
Connecting the dots between the many sources of information reveals that cancer is simply a construct of chronic inflammation. The dots (sources) involved in this effort is simply too numerous to list, but a short-list includes; books, lectures, published scientific studies, observations, family tragedy, friends, individuals and of course, Callie: all pointing in the same direction. Possibly the final tying together of all these hundreds of dots occurred in a live lecture by Dr. John McDougall. The simple, clarified revelation from the connection of all these dots is that cancer is simply a state of run-a-way inflammation.

Inflammation, from any cause, results in cellular damage. Intuitively, cell damage prompts cell regrowth. As the damage perpetuates, the cells reproduction rate likewise increases. Eventually, a break-over point is reached where the cells loses reproduction control. And, that is cancer. Basically; no inflammation = no cancer. It is considered that a tumor is the cancer and that a tumor often metastasizes to other parts of the body. Truth is; the inflammation that results in cancer was already there long before growing into a detectable tumor.

Loss
In my electronics design engineering career, I have direct experience with the of law-of-physics that ensures all conversions occur with loss - regardless of subject. The more conversions the more loss. The life-line starts with photosynthesis in plants assembling water and minerals into nutrients with photon energy from the sun. An animal eating the plants is another set of conversions; another level of loss. As can be seen in biology class, all animals have a significant percentage of their anatomy dedicated to loss, also known as waste. Being at the beginning of the life line, plants have the least loss. So little that they have no need for waste removal organs such as intestines, kidneys, cardiovascular, lymph, etc. systems.

The life-line starts with photosynthesis in plants, then to animals called herbivores that eat the plants, then animals called carnivores (which include cats) that eat the herbivores. There are very few carnivores that eat carnivores. Herbivores are known as prey animals, because they are more nutritious than carnivores because they are further up the life-line towards the nutrient source: plants, thus fewer nutrient conversions = less loss. Along that line, nutrition density starts with plants and decline with each conversion (step). Each conversion is an animal or organism consuming the nutrients for their construction and energy.

Why is animal protein inflammatory - carcinogenic?
Protein from plants is primarily provided by the original amino acids that are then assembled into protein by the herbivore's DNA. Protein for a carnivore (or any animal that ate meat) must disassemble the protein it got from eating the herbivore back into the original amino acids, that came from the plant, and then rebuild it into protein in compliance with the carnivore's DNA. Remember; there is loss with every conversion, which means, not all of the animal's protein gets disassembled. The remaining protein is waste, thus removed by the waste management systems; intestines, kidneys, etc. Unfortunately, there is loss in that process as well, resulting in intact animal proteins entering the body cavity and blood stream where it is transported, collecting in tissues throughout the body. I believe we are all aware that patients that receive an organ transplant requires anti-rejection drugs. These drugs inhibit the immune system from attacking the foreign, transplanted organ. The immune system regards Intact animal proteins as foreign because it is constructed by a different DNA. Thus, the immune system attacks it. And, as always, there is loss in that process as well, resulting in collateral damage; also known as inflammation. Remember; no inflammation = no cancer.

Patrik Baboumian, world record-holding strongman, was asked how he could get as strong as an ox without eating any meat. His answer was, "have you ever seen an ox eating meat?"

Please understand that I am not a medical professional in any capacity. This writing is only to share my experience and what I have learned from it.

Nothing in life is more inhibiting, failing or debilitating than the belief; "I Can't."
Nothing in life is more freeing, enabling or successful than the belief; "I Can."

 

DrCarney.com allows Member Blogs. Opinions in Member Blogs are views of the Member Blogger and not necessarily of Dr. Carney. Registered Users may request a FREE upgrade for blogging permission. Bloggers agree to support Dr. Carney's Starch-Smart-System.

    
×
Stay Informed

When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.

3 Diseases Linked to Egg Consumption
WHO Says Processed Meats Cause Cancer?

Related Posts

 
People in this conversation
Comments (2)
No ratings yet. Be the first to rate!
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

I'm so glad you are part of this community Ken. I really appreciate your contributions.

Regarding feeding a carnivore an herbaceous diet: I have read considerable research and encountered many additional case reports indicating that dogs can be fed a suitably-formulated plant-based diet & thrive. Our Bart lived twice as long as the usual life-expectancy for dogs his size. I also understand that there is similar evidence & experience with cats.

In reading more about this recently, one authority suggested that ... in general... any animal can be safely fed LOWER on the food chain (assuming all nutrients needs are met) than the reverse.

If that is true therefore, we can expect carnivores to live longer & healthier when eating a suitably-formulated plant-based diet than when they eat their more natural diet; and herbivores to live shorter, sicker lives when eating higher on the food chain.

We've seen this to be true of dogs & cats; and also with humans. Being physiological herbivores, we CAN eat higher on the food chain (such as in modern society, northern Inuit & African Masai) but the consequences are shortened life-span and inferior health.

Comment was last edited about 7 years ago by Deborah Deborah
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Hi Deborah,
Thank you for that contribution.
What we have learned, with Callie, is that it takes a lot more food volume than her body is designed for, because plant-based foods are low in calorie density, but high nutrient density. Herbivore's, including humans, have larger stomachs, long, segmented and corrugated intestines designed for the benefit of fiber in nutrient absorption and sized for lower calorie density. Carnivores have smaller stomachs, shorter smooth, non-corrugated intestines that are not designed for fiber, but is designed for high calorie density. With that, plant-based food flows through her too fast for all the nutrients to be absorbed. To make up the difference, she has to eat many times throughout the day. Callie eats an average of 27 servings per day and even a few in the night (Yes, I get up to feed her at night). I equate that to a human infant whose digestive system is not yet fully developed. That means she eats and poops a lot, but she is trim, strong, alert and fully in control - especially for a 16-year-old cat.

Comment was last edited about 7 years ago by Ken Thomas Ken Thomas
There are no comments posted here yet
Leave your comments
Posting as Guest
×
Rate this post:
Suggested Locations

Off Canvas Main Menu Display